3 ms·
Good article, if a bit too long. When it comes to retirement savings, I grapple with the same dilemma I have with other areas like drugs or gambling. What is th
by RestlessMind 2y ago
Good article, if a bit too long. When it comes to retirement savings, I grapple with the same dilemma I have with other areas like drugs or gambling. What is the sweet spot on the spectrum where one end is a draconian nanny state dictating everything with minimal personal freedoms, and the other end is complete personal freedom to do anything one wants to themselves and live with the consequences.
Like many things in life, the correct balance seems to be somewhere in the middle - a basic amount of mandatory retirement saving, incentives to save more if one wants to while capping those incentives so that ultra-rich don't game it, a minimal safety net for the unluckiest among us funded via taxes, freedom for one to invest in what they want, strict rules and regulations on providers of retirement plans & vehicles to prevent fraud. American system seems to have a lot of basic components in place and may need only some small tweaks, relatively speaking, to find the right balance.
- ghaff 2y agoRight. And one of the realities that the comments on the NYT article largely ignore is that defined benefits didn’t come from a magic money tree. Like other benefits they reduced other comp by some amount. So employees never got defined benefits for free. They got some predictable payout upon retirement which they probably didn’t even think about when younger—mostly provided they had decade+ tenure at a large company.