3 ms·
As noted elsewhere, this is aopinion piece and thefore is entitled to present one side of the story without attempting to summarize the entire situation. It's l
by raganwald 14y ago
As noted elsewhere, this is aopinion piece and thefore is entitled to present one side of the story without attempting to summarize the entire situation. It's like the difference between a political editorial and political coverage in a newspaper.
The important question is whether the one side it presents is presented coherently and without fallacy.
- jasonlotito 14y agoAnd, has been noted elsewhere as well, where on the page does it say the piece is just an opinion piece? I'll save you the trouble: it doesn't. So, while you maybe right, CNN doesn't indicate in any way that this is the case.
- sipefree 14y agoThe header: "Apple 2.0 - Covering the business that Steve Jobs built" shows the category that this blog post is in. While it doesn't point out in big letters that this is an opinion piece, this article is in the category of a well established Apple opinion blog in their tech blogs category. It's also pretty clear from the writing style that this is an opinion piece.
- pacmon 14y agoSure, it's probably easy to tell for someone who's a regular reader of CNN. However, I believe that most people - even several (if not many) from HN - will see the CNN header, then read the article and assume it's CNN. They should be A LOT clearer about it being an opinion piece.