2 ms·
Laravel looks nice but I agree the internal/default naming conventions and structures are a bit odd for 2012. Hopefully this will be changed in an upcoming vers
by soulclap 14y ago
Laravel looks nice but I agree the internal/default naming conventions and structures are a bit odd for 2012. Hopefully this will be changed in an upcoming version.
- kbanman 14y agoWhat naming conventions specifically don't you like?
- soulclap 14y agoI guess it is mainly the fact that it's not using CamelCase for directories, all lower-case filenames, underscores in methods and class names (_Task). I am re-building a project in Laravel right now that I started with Slim, using a couple of Symfony components and own code and it's a bit of a turn-off for me that I ended up with quite mixed naming conventions now. With so many PSR-0 compliant PHP libraries and Composer on the rise, I just think it's the way to go. This doesn't stop me from trying Laravel though and so far this is the only thing that kind of bugs me. But don't get me wrong, basically I really like it so far.