> the only way to have good online conversations is to filter out 90% of the population Moderation is not an anti-pattern, but trying to do it at scale without

> the only way to have good online conversations is to filter out 90% of the population Moderation is not an anti-pattern, but trying to do it at scale without robust tools and strong identity management is destined to fail. The real anti-pattern in communication is allowing destructive behaviour to undermine the discussion. So, to re-state your point: The only way to have good online conversations is to restrict participation to people who are actively willing to discuss, to learn, and to commit to making a constructive contribution. This implies strong identity management and moderation.