I agree, but the "constexpr" weirdness links to a video with a clickbait title. You are expected to watch most of the video, before learning that the purpose o

I agree, but the "constexpr" weirdness links to a video with a clickbait title. You are expected to watch most of the video, before learning that the purpose of the video is to argue that in almost all cases one should use "static constexpr" and not just "constexpr". The argumentation can be interesting, but it would have been nicer to just state the conclusion from the beginning, allowing a decision of whether it is desirable to spend time to also know the reasons for this.