4 ms·
They have a lot more power than you might think from that quote. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Relations_Board#Processing_of_charges https://en.
by nickff 2y ago
They have a lot more power than you might think from that quote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Relations_Board#Processing_of_charges https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Relations_Board...
They can now try Apple in an administrative court, with an 'administrative judge' selected by the agency, then get a (normal) Article 3 court to rubber-stamp their 'order'.
- couchand 2y agoNot a lawyer here. Why does an Article III judge need to get involved, and not in other administrative matters, like say, in an administrative immigration case? edit: further investigation has indicated that it's immigration law which deviates from usual practice of administrative law, which would potentially expect an automatic stay in a context like this.
- semiquaver 2y agoTo the contrary, the order already exists (“stop it”) and this article describes the second part of the process you linked to: > The decision of the Administrative Law Judge may be reviewed by the five member board