Chalmers has given arguments for panpsychism so I dont think hes totally opposed to the idea. And Im not so sure materialism necessitates reduction of consciou

Chalmers has given arguments for panpsychism so I dont think hes totally opposed to the idea. And Im not so sure materialism necessitates reduction of consciousness. It entirely depends on what one considers to be "material". I would hold for example, that if consciousness were a fundamental property of all matter, it would fit any functional meaning of the term "material" as it relates to scientific inquiry. By "materialism" what we really seem to mean here is "a conservatory position on what constitutes material". If one accepts consciousness as a property of matter, then it becomes a materialist view, no?