3 ms·
I understand where you’re coming from but don’t think it’s sad personally. Why should it be? It’s the same as if someone doesn’t do any other activity. I rarely
by dieselgate 2y ago
I understand where you’re coming from but don’t think it’s sad personally. Why should it be? It’s the same as if someone doesn’t do any other activity.
I rarely read or finish books but spend all that time doing myriad other things which give meaning and have relevancy.
Not to say there aren’t books which are important to me I would just generally rather do other things.
This makes me think of the bit from Bill Hicks about “what you reading for?”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BwkdGr9JYmE https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BwkdGr9JYmE
- Semaphor 2y agoI came to the same conclusion right after the first sentence: > Or maybe not really sad, …
- simonw 2y agoEvidently no one will read your second sentence!
- Semaphor 2y agoThe comments here really now make me think that it is sad, because reading comprehension is sorely lacking.
- block_dagger 2y agoDirectly contradicting your opening sentence, no less.