I don't know... based on your excerpts, the main objection is that the cost of putting the panels in space exceeds the net benefit. The claim seems to basically

I don't know... based on your excerpts, the main objection is that the cost of putting the panels in space exceeds the net benefit. The claim seems to basically be that, in 33 years, that objection will no longer apply because tossing a couple stations into space will no longer be a big deal, expense-wise.