3 ms·

I think the separation happens organically, and is driven by efficiency. The environment needed for maximizing work is often at odds with the environment for m

by gffrd 2y ago

I think the separation happens organically, and is driven by efficiency. The environment needed for maximizing work is often at odds with the environment for maximizing leisure.

wuyishan 2y ago
"maximizing" seems to be the problem here.
babypuncher 2y ago
Well it hurts the efficiency of both when people have to spend 2+ hours of every work day commuting.
- onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
  Unless you're in the business of selling gas or cars... Or single family homes with a large yard and a white picket fence 1+ hour outside of the city...
beretguy 2y ago
Separation does not happen organically. Rich people and governments are in charge of city planning and they make wrong decisions based on making profits. In city where I live some rich dude contributed to our city governor’s campaign or something. Now governor has to “return the favor” by relocating thousands of government employees from downtown area which is close to a lot of people’s homes to outskirts of the city where nobody lives and where that rich dude owns office space for rent. https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article281838213.html https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article281... Wasting hours in traffic every day/week won’t give you any time for leisure.
tuxpenguine 2y ago
It's doesn't happen organically. It is usually designed by city planners (or equivalent functions depending on the city). It makes most sense to have mixture of residential and commercial buildings in the same area so that there is no foot traffic vacuum depending on the time of the day. Foot traffic vacuum creates space for potential crimes. (e.g, if you separate commercial and residential, the commercial area will be more likely crime ridden at night and residential area will be more prone to crime during the day).

3 ms·

I think the separation happens organically, and is driven by efficiency. The environment needed for maximizing work is often at odds with the environment for m

by gffrd 2y ago

I think the separation happens organically, and is driven by efficiency. The environment needed for maximizing work is often at odds with the environment for maximizing leisure.

wuyishan 2y ago
"maximizing" seems to be the problem here.
babypuncher 2y ago
Well it hurts the efficiency of both when people have to spend 2+ hours of every work day commuting.
- onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
  Unless you're in the business of selling gas or cars... Or single family homes with a large yard and a white picket fence 1+ hour outside of the city...
beretguy 2y ago
Separation does not happen organically. Rich people and governments are in charge of city planning and they make wrong decisions based on making profits. In city where I live some rich dude contributed to our city governor’s campaign or something. Now governor has to “return the favor” by relocating thousands of government employees from downtown area which is close to a lot of people’s homes to outskirts of the city where nobody lives and where that rich dude owns office space for rent. https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article281838213.html https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article281... Wasting hours in traffic every day/week won’t give you any time for leisure.
tuxpenguine 2y ago
It's doesn't happen organically. It is usually designed by city planners (or equivalent functions depending on the city). It makes most sense to have mixture of residential and commercial buildings in the same area so that there is no foot traffic vacuum depending on the time of the day. Foot traffic vacuum creates space for potential crimes. (e.g, if you separate commercial and residential, the commercial area will be more likely crime ridden at night and residential area will be more prone to crime during the day).