4 ms·
Isn't ventilation most of the time built into offices and hence much better than what you can get in most residentual buildings?
by valenterry 2y ago
Isn't ventilation most of the time built into offices and hence much better than what you can get in most residentual buildings?
- dv_dt 2y agoI would think that the people density that an office space is built for is higher than residential density. Even a studio apt is more individual space than many shared office layouts.
- kbenson 2y agoWhen it works, sure. You don't generally sleep for extended periods in an office though, so would probably notice it getting stuffy. Sleeping or bedridden people might not notice or be able to easily do something about it though if oxygen levels drop.
- valenterry 2y agoSleeping produces less co2 than working. Therefore, if you don't feel it getting stuffy (without opening windows) at work time, then sleep time should be no issue. Besides, offices have to deal with more people than residential buildings. And air quality depends on the number of people (and what they do).
- kbenson 2y agoThe difference when sleeping compared to resting or low activity work is that sleeping is about 60%-65% of resting from what I've found.[1] I'm not sure why we should assume that shouldn't be a problem. We could be close to a low oxygen situation prior to sleep, and then start sleeping and have hours for it to get worse. We don't generally design safety regulations around "should" and averages, but instead when edge cases happen, as the magnitude of the outcome is very important to take into consideration. I'm not sure what you're trying to express with your comment. 1: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/co2-persons-d_691.html https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/co2-persons-d_691.html
- valenterry 2y agoIt's simple: if working for 8 hours with many people is not a problem for the ventilation system, then sleeping with less (residential) people should be no issue at all.
- bloomingeek 2y agoMost high rise office buildings use steam (older bldgs) or heat strip for heating. If there's an electrical problem, all fans blowing the treated air stop. They use chilled water flowing through air handling units for A/C. (in winter, these same units supply the heated air, the flow of chill water is usually halted.) In a system like this, if the AHU stops for any reason, the whole floor is effected. Since chillers and associated equipment are very expensive, I would imagine the maintenance fees would be uncomfortable. (get it? Sorry.)
- Loughla 2y agoI think maybe spread out across all owners it might be palatable. You have to figure, if your heating/AC conks out, you're into that for 20k. So that's a pretty decent number when/if you're talking about multiple flats on one floor, right?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jrockway 2y agoEvery big building I ever lived in in Chicago had this system but for residential use. I am sure it is expensive when it breaks, but it is also amortized across hundreds of units. I'd go so far as to say it's "industry standard" so isn't going to be much of an obstacle for converting office buildings to residential spaces. (In NYC, we all agreed to believe that there is no such thing as residential air conditioning that is not in the form of a window unit, however.)