2 ms·
Even so, the physics of everything being amenable to life, etc... seems like just as easily none of that could have existed. Instead, we have gravity, strong nu
by throwitaway222 2y ago
Even so, the physics of everything being amenable to life, etc... seems like just as easily none of that could have existed. Instead, we have gravity, strong nuke forces, and everything on up (temperature, water molecules) that all seem to be "pro life".
It's like everything in the universe wants existence and to be felt by something. I can't just assume coincidence because of that.
- mrkeen 2y ago> seems like just as easily none of that could have existed. There is infinite stuff which does not exist.
- krapp 2y ago> It's like everything in the universe wants existence and to be felt by something. How so? We have one example of life existing anywhere in the universe, our own biosphere. Everything else in the universe that we observe appears dead or hostile to life as we know it. If it's the case that "everything in the universe wants existence and to be felt by something" it seems weird that this universal cosmic need expresses itself through mostly insects and bacteria and a few primates on one planet, and everything else is mostly dark matter and gamma rays and black holes and burning gas.