"Insufferable nitwit interviewers at New Scientist, not so much." Think that's a bit strong. I didn't take "you claim to be" as anything close to framing Musk

"Insufferable nitwit interviewers at New Scientist, not so much." Think that's a bit strong. I didn't take "you claim to be" as anything close to framing Musk as potentially lying. "It is designed to impeach the credibility of the subject in the reader's view" If that is the case there would have been more wording like this in the interview. I'm not seeing that in any of the other questions, at least nothing that is worthy of calling the writers at "Insufferable nitwit interviewers". Which in itself has made me think there is some general disrespect for New Scientist which I wasn't aware of. New Scientist seems to have fairly good demographics we're not talking about People Magazine here.