I'm not saying it necessarily impedes, I'm saying that at least it's never positive, at most neutral. The fact you believe it should or not does not change the

I'm not saying it necessarily impedes, I'm saying that at least it's never positive, at most neutral. The fact you believe it should or not does not change the harsh reality. I'm saying that to sell to enteprise with a good UX you need to check a lot of checkboxes, and even if they are independent , the probability to have: * can sell to enterprise is less than * can sell to enterprise + have a good UX. because while you can sell to enterprise without a good UX (regardless of how much you and I feel bad about this), you can't sell to enteprise without being to navigate their processes, without being able to talk and please their compliance team, to reassure that no you will no go bankrupt in 1 year. And I'm saying that it's most likely to impede having a good UX because a company's resource is limited. To start with strong UX fundation means that you've decided either to recrute one less dev, and instead hire a UX designer, or you've recruited a developer with a good UX sense (and it does not cost less, most likely more, than a developer without a good UX sense). Same, when developing a new feature, taking the UX in account takes equally or more time/money than without. So at the end a lot of company selling to enterprise ends up with a product without a good UX. And indeed Odoo is a good example that it's not impossible, which I'm not saying, just less probable.