3 ms·
> The moral issue I have is that simply put, if I don't have the money for something, I wasn't meant to have that something. You're thinking of debt as a consu
by jjav 2y ago
> The moral issue I have is that simply put, if I don't have the money for something, I wasn't meant to have that something.
You're thinking of debt as a consumer. Like, take a personal loan or credit card debt and buy a big screen TV. Yes, that's dumb.
Not all debt is like that. Picture this scenario: Your bank pays 5% interest on deposits. You're offered a loan from somewhere for an interest rate of 4.9%. It is a no-brainer to take that loan, go into debt, for as much as possible! Deposit it into your bank account and profit each month. If the rates change such that the bank pays less, just pay off the loan.
Now, sure, that's a simplistic scenario since nobody will offer you a loan for less than the banks are paying interest right now. But with time being another variable, you can manouver yourself into that situation. Right now my bank pays more interest than the percentage I pay on my mortgage balance. I'm literally making money every month by having debt. It would be very dumb to pay off that mortgage debt even though I have the cash to do so.
- mlrtime 2y agoNo brainer may be pushing it... At a minimum there is duration risk and other various terms in the note where this breaks down quickly. Banks do this all the time and some often fail.