3 ms·
Kubrick’s film simplified the psychological depth and literary nuances of Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel, adapting its themes and character dynamics to fit both
by fermigier 2y ago
Kubrick’s film simplified the psychological depth and literary nuances of Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel, adapting its themes and character dynamics to fit both the cinematic form and the censorship norms of its time. Constrained by the Hays Code and societal taboos of the 1960s, it toned down the explicitness of the sexual elements of the story. The was more overt humor and satire in the film, partly as a way to address the censorship regulations of the time. This approach changes the tone from the intensely personal and tragic to something lighter and more accessible, though still deeply disturbing.
Note that Nabokov was credited as the screenplay writer for the movie (Kubrick is uncredited). https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056193/fullcredits/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056193/fullcredits/
- ghaff 2y agoThe criticism seems pretty fair. Not sure how filmable the book is especially given the constraints of the time.
- trwm 2y agoThe constraints of today would be much worse. I'd go so far as saying that making even Kubricks version today would be impossible.
- ghaff 2y agoThat may be fair. Arguably different constraints. But would probably be pretty radioactive especially with a Lolita at an age faithful to the book.
- Detrytus 2y agoHow does that compare to 1997 "Lolita" with Jeremy Irons?