5 ms·
> I suspect they're not getting a dedicated server from Amazon. If it's literally called a dedicated server, why would you suspect otherwise? Source: I worked
by yolovoe 2y ago
> I suspect they're not getting a dedicated server from Amazon.
If it's literally called a dedicated server, why would you suspect otherwise?
Source: I worked in the core EC2 dataplane for a couple years. PEs and leadership there would not be happy with misleading customers. We constantly thought of the customer experience there.
- oooyay 2y agoGenerally you get a "dedicated host" from AWS, not a "dedicated server" so that was kind of my first tip off. There's a very big difference; the only usecase I'd really consider for dedicated hosts is security related and, frankly, they're far more expensive than any colo box. Dedicated Hosts are also far more restrictive than what you get at a colo DC. Second, even if AWS offered to let you have full control of a rack box you'd have to be economically out of your mind with AWS' network costs compared to a colo DC.
- StackRanker3000 2y agoI think you misread the comment you responded to. It didn’t mean ”I suspect that what they are getting from Amazon isn’t a dedicated server”. Rather it meant ”I suspect that they’re getting a dedicated server from somewhere else that isn’t Amazon”. The original comment was talking about a dedicated machine for personal projects with a fixed cost of $40/month.
- yolovoe 2y agoAh, this makes sense. Thanks for clarifying!