>Addressing a failure in reading comprehension is not moving goal posts. I addressed your failure indeed. To quote, "And yet, they exist. That's the point. The

>Addressing a failure in reading comprehension is not moving goal posts. I addressed your failure indeed. To quote, "And yet, they exist. That's the point. These sorts of groups all exist in one fashion or another." No one has denied they exist. >Also, goal posts cannot screech, as they are neither animal nor animatronic. Wrong. Screeching is not limited to animals/animatronics [0]. >They are quantitatively different, but ultimately, both are nautical vessels. They are qualitatively different as one is an auxiliary vessel. >The Guardian and Observer style guide defines cliches as cliches Overused words and phrases to be avoided, some of which merit their own ignominious entry in this guide Immaterial. This is not The Guardian/Observer, nor am I a journalist at those newspapers. That's three strikes, you're out! So cliché! >Then I will go back and regress so far so as to be in the furthest horizon, beyond your view. It's so close there too. >Huxley was more prescient than Orewell Debatable, but the prescience of this quote cannot be understated: "The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats." >Orwell, who was a socialist and fought for the red cause in Spain. Which makes this all the more hilarious. Truly Poe's Law in action. [0] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/screeching https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/screechi...