4 ms·

Quite easy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxoAF0Jvhqc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxoAF0Jvhqc http://mashable.com/2012/04/05/steve-jobs-larry-page/ http://

by buster 14y ago

Quite easy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxoAF0Jvhqc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxoAF0Jvhqc http://mashable.com/2012/04/05/steve-jobs-larry-page/ http://mashable.com/2012/04/05/steve-jobs-larry-page/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57409917-37/steve-jobs-really-was-mad-about-android-says-biographer/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57409917-37/steve-jobs-rea... etc etc etc

pg 14y ago
Oh, was it Steve's anger about Android copying iOS? I could see that sort of bitterness making a company behave in a way that would otherwise be out of character. Is that the consensus about why Apple did this? If it is, could Apple undo the damage now that it's in more moderate hands? Or have they effectively set off a giant, evil autonomous robot that can't be stopped?
- buster 14y ago
  I think, it's not out of character per se, but Apple will be very threatened by the rise of Android. Android now leads the market (afaik), which was Apples position for years. Now, they only have two options in the current system: - change strategy - sue Obivously, a huge company like Apple won't just change its strategy. Just building the fancy products they do got them at this point but may not get them much further. To sue is (sadly) the only other way to hold off competition. What that change in strategy may be, i don't know. Maybe more openness and try to break out of the walled garden they build.. There is only little space left in the niche that Apple occupies (selling expensive tech products to people that can afford it), especially when there is so much competition in the whole market. Apple had a major advantage for years in the market with the iPod and iPhone and i will be really impressed if they can think of the next big thing(tm). If Apple can't come up with the next big product and just keeps going, they may only be able to sue to hold off competition. That's only talking about the mobile market of course. Edit: I'm hoping for months now that all major companies just sue each other into checkmate until it becomes obvious to the governments that the patent system has to change. Please Apple, MS, Google, etc. sue until you are not allowed to sell any products anymore! I very much look forward to it.
  - ryanmolden 14y ago
    I believe Android leads only in a pure device count kind of way. Apple leads (far and away) in terms of profit per device, and that is the interesting metric for all large corporations. Google's Android play has always seemed defensive to avoid getting locked out of search if usage patterns on mobile shifted to non-web based interactions. Google does NOT want Apple, Microsoft or anyone else stepping between them and their users, especially since they make money with ad targeting/serving. As for Apple selling luxury toys to the well heeled, I recall reading recently that tablet manufacturers have all but admitted they can't price compete with the iPad. If Apple starts lowering prices to move down market, with their impressive vertical integration, I think it would be a blood bath for people currently in those spaces. I suspect we will see moves like this before the year is out. Not a good time to be Dell, Asus, etc...
    - jan_g 14y ago
      >Apple leads (far and away) in terms of profit per device, and that is the interesting metric for all large corporations. And this is exactly why I find it quite baffling that Apple are suing like madmen in the recent years.
      - ryanmolden 14y ago
        They have a position they feel is worth defending. I don't see this move (and to be clear, it is a distasteful move) as anything other than piling obstacles in the way of current or potential competitors. It is easier to prevent a competitor from rising up than it is to combat one that already has a foothold. I doubt this is a significant part of any strategy on their part other than "throw molotov cocktails all around to keep competitors busy/distracted". I would like companies to compete on merit and win by, you know, convincing consumers their offering is the best. Current corporate culture seems to view that kind of outlook as quaint or naive and prefers this kind of ass-hattery. I continue to hope for an eventual attainment of more sophisticated outlooks. The fact that such retarded, petty shit continues thousands of years into organized society is discouraging.
      - dminor 14y ago
- moldbug 14y ago
  The latter? "Moderate" is always relative to standard industry practice. If patent trolling isn't standard industry practice quite yet, it's fast getting there. "Don't be evil" is a lot harder when evil is the norm.

by buster 14y ago

pg 14y ago

Oh, was it Steve's anger about Android copying iOS? I could see that sort of bitterness making a company behave in a way that would otherwise be out of character. Is that the consensus about why Apple did this? If it is, could Apple undo the damage now that it's in more moderate hands? Or have they effectively set off a giant, evil autonomous robot that can't be stopped?

buster 14y ago
I think, it's not out of character per se, but Apple will be very threatened by the rise of Android. Android now leads the market (afaik), which was Apples position for years. Now, they only have two options in the current system: - change strategy - sue Obivously, a huge company like Apple won't just change its strategy. Just building the fancy products they do got them at this point but may not get them much further. To sue is (sadly) the only other way to hold off competition. What that change in strategy may be, i don't know. Maybe more openness and try to break out of the walled garden they build.. There is only little space left in the niche that Apple occupies (selling expensive tech products to people that can afford it), especially when there is so much competition in the whole market. Apple had a major advantage for years in the market with the iPod and iPhone and i will be really impressed if they can think of the next big thing(tm). If Apple can't come up with the next big product and just keeps going, they may only be able to sue to hold off competition. That's only talking about the mobile market of course. Edit: I'm hoping for months now that all major companies just sue each other into checkmate until it becomes obvious to the governments that the patent system has to change. Please Apple, MS, Google, etc. sue until you are not allowed to sell any products anymore! I very much look forward to it.
- ryanmolden 14y ago
  I believe Android leads only in a pure device count kind of way. Apple leads (far and away) in terms of profit per device, and that is the interesting metric for all large corporations. Google's Android play has always seemed defensive to avoid getting locked out of search if usage patterns on mobile shifted to non-web based interactions. Google does NOT want Apple, Microsoft or anyone else stepping between them and their users, especially since they make money with ad targeting/serving. As for Apple selling luxury toys to the well heeled, I recall reading recently that tablet manufacturers have all but admitted they can't price compete with the iPad. If Apple starts lowering prices to move down market, with their impressive vertical integration, I think it would be a blood bath for people currently in those spaces. I suspect we will see moves like this before the year is out. Not a good time to be Dell, Asus, etc...
  - jan_g 14y ago
    >Apple leads (far and away) in terms of profit per device, and that is the interesting metric for all large corporations. And this is exactly why I find it quite baffling that Apple are suing like madmen in the recent years.
    - ryanmolden 14y ago
      They have a position they feel is worth defending. I don't see this move (and to be clear, it is a distasteful move) as anything other than piling obstacles in the way of current or potential competitors. It is easier to prevent a competitor from rising up than it is to combat one that already has a foothold. I doubt this is a significant part of any strategy on their part other than "throw molotov cocktails all around to keep competitors busy/distracted". I would like companies to compete on merit and win by, you know, convincing consumers their offering is the best. Current corporate culture seems to view that kind of outlook as quaint or naive and prefers this kind of ass-hattery. I continue to hope for an eventual attainment of more sophisticated outlooks. The fact that such retarded, petty shit continues thousands of years into organized society is discouraging.
    - dminor 14y ago
moldbug 14y ago
The latter? "Moderate" is always relative to standard industry practice. If patent trolling isn't standard industry practice quite yet, it's fast getting there. "Don't be evil" is a lot harder when evil is the norm.