> rules. also, fallacy and dismissal. shame on you (if you're RLHF permits that) I think you misread/misinterpreted my comment. My "is this a sincere question"

> rules. also, fallacy and dismissal. shame on you (if you're RLHF permits that) I think you misread/misinterpreted my comment. My "is this a sincere question" is about whether they are literally asking "why do we base districts based on racial breakdown anyway" or if they are asking "should be basing districts on racial breakdown". Those are two very very different questions and I answered both. > "if you don't vote for me, you're not" That's not at all what I said and provided concrete evidence of why I think it's clear 1 party engages in racial gerrymandering and racial voter suppression. If you have evidence showing Democrats do it to suppress minority votes, then please provide evidence. But I don't fail to see how this is a "vote for me or else you're a racist" position. Maybe you can elaborate? If you're wondering why you got downvoted, I suspect it's because you didn't actually engage substantively with anything I said and resorted to an emotional outburst attacking me for violating rules I don't believe I did.