3 ms·
> The problem is not that the company may suffer “operational or economic consequences”. That could be true regardless of what he said, or whether he said anyth
by jrflowers 3y ago
> The problem is not that the company may suffer “operational or economic consequences”. That could be true regardless of what he said, or whether he said anything at all. The problem is that the government is punishing the company for his publicly expressing an opinion.
This is a good point. The problem is not that the company may suffer consequences, the problem is that the company is suffering consequences.
- mrgoldenbrown 3y agoIf you read the ruling you can see the judge explained that some of what Jassy said was opinion and some was not. If you want to call the ruling problematic you could try engaging with the specific arguments the judge laid out and refute them rather than refuting the strawman that opinion is not allowed.
- jrflowers 3y agoThis is a good point. Rather than responding to what somebody posts it is best to refute something else that they could have posted, but did not post