>Wishing to live in a world in which no one could ever break the law, or in which companies were somehow magically responsible for guaranteeing no one would eve

>Wishing to live in a world in which no one could ever break the law, or in which companies were somehow magically responsible for guaranteeing no one would ever misuse their products is not a good outcome. This is classic straw man stuff. No one is pretending we live in a perfect world in which these companies can hit a button and prevent all crime. The question is just what is the bare minimum of work they should do to prevent abuse. Everyone agrees with this at some level. We don't want Youtube to be filled with CSAM and we all agree that Google has some responsibility in preventing that. Once again, the question is just where the line exists.