> Laser-focusing down to only the "main" reason and ignoring all else will (as expected) miss the forest for the trees. This is a very strange presentation of

> Laser-focusing down to only the "main" reason and ignoring all else will (as expected) miss the forest for the trees. This is a very strange presentation of this concept. You think that the "forest" is the ancilliary reasons? I would say that with zero subsidies people would still be driving cars and consuming fossil fuels. The only reasons not to are: pollution, and city space. They are unreasonably effective and useful compared to all other options. That's why people like them.