3 ms·
This is seriously better than the old "gettyimages" watermark. And it's a very thoughtful way to get traffic back to their website. It (almost implicitly) expec
by officemonkey 14y ago
This is seriously better than the old "gettyimages" watermark. And it's a very thoughtful way to get traffic back to their website. It (almost implicitly) expects people to use and share the watermarked image.
I predict a greater use of watermarked images and greater traffic back to Getty Images.
- rorrr 14y agoThey could've made shorter URLs if they used numbers and letters (base 36).
- mayanksinghal 14y agoNot sure if there are any comparative studies about it, but aren't random numbers a lot more readable than random alphabets (with numbers)? I have read people raise this issue with IPv6. Choosing to use just numbers seems like a good idea to me.
- officemonkey 14y agoPhone numbers in the U.S. used to have a exchange name followed by numbers (the most famous example is "Pennsylvania 6-5000"). Folks would dial "P-E" (which is why there were letters on the old dial phones) and then the digits. I can assume that they fell out of favor because human memory favored the "3 digit-4 digit" chunking of the phone number rather than the "two letter-5 digit" chunking.
- matt312 14y agoThe short URL link isn't just random, it correlates to the image's "Creative Image Number".
- officemonkey 14y agoAh, so powerusers can just write down the number and know it's the Getty "Creative Image Number" and look it up at their liesure. Very clever.