All speech laws have exceptions. E.g. it obviously wouldn't be "free speech" if a CEO was lying about company performance to investors. I think what makes this

All speech laws have exceptions. E.g. it obviously wouldn't be "free speech" if a CEO was lying about company performance to investors. I think what makes this case so weird is where the line is. There are legitimate reasons to not join a union and a company should be allowed to vocalize those reasons, of course the line is being crossed when the company threatens it's employees. But how far did the Amazon CEO go? Unions will add bureaucracy, that is certainly a fact and companies should be allowed to say as much...