3 ms·
I agree swores. Your comment did say 'traditional' and my comment was facetious. There's been an historical transition from small chains owned by individuals (
by colloydi 2y ago
I agree swores. Your comment did say 'traditional' and my comment was facetious.
There's been an historical transition from small chains owned by individuals (e.g. the Victorian Mr John Sainsbury) to big brands (e.g. Superdrug), hasn't there.
The possessive apostrophe was appropriate for the former but surely less so nowadays. I would guess "Sainsbury's" was a rebrand intended to reflect tradition.
- swores 2y agoBleh, I might've realised you were kidding had I gone to Starbucks's this morning