4 ms·
Pretty sure the actual world leading experts on Ukraine’s situation are the ones making battlefield decisions in Ukraine. Like the other commenter said, what a
by llamaimperative 3y ago
Pretty sure the actual world leading experts on Ukraine’s situation are the ones making battlefield decisions in Ukraine. Like the other commenter said, what a fascinating model of the world you’ve built here.
- cpursley 3y agoHolding a non-narrative driven view might be fascinating for some, I suppose.
- llamaimperative 3y agoYou are literally constructing a narrative that western news media makes the decisions on the Ukrainian battlefield.
- cpursley 3y agoYes, it is a major contributing factor. PR wins help with public support for funding. This situation/topic is not the only situation they intentionally manipulate public option on.
- llamaimperative 3y agoLots of narrative here buddy
- cpursley 3y agoLot of books, buddy. You might want to start with this one: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12617.Manufacturing_Consent https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12617.Manufacturing_Cons...
- llamaimperative 3y agoI'm pretty sure that "western news anchors produce an expected-to-fail counteroffensive in Ukraine" would even make Chomsky roll his eyes. Your explanation is not even internally coherent. A successful counteroffensive is a PR win. An unsuccessful one is a PR loss, obviously.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cpursley 3y agoHis thoughts on this conflict are a simple Google search away.
- llamaimperative 3y agoPlease link to any source in which he makes the argument you're making. I looked and couldn't find any. Your argument is dismissible on its own merits and Chomsky believing it as well won't change that, but I am curious if he does.