3 ms·
It isn't and shouldn't be different in war time either. If you allow this exception, you will just always be at war. Censorship for security reasons isn't a ne
by raxxorraxor 2y ago
It isn't and shouldn't be different in war time either. If you allow this exception, you will just always be at war.
Censorship for security reasons isn't a new concept.
- mrtksn 2y agoNot at all, you can't be at war all the time as people and ammo is limited resource. Just stick tight to definitions and observe for technicality BS. I.e. don't take "War on drugs" as a war, don't assume you are at war when the countries no longer fight but technically never signed a peace agreement etc. I think I made it pretty clear that the exception for censorship is only when people are actively killing each other and this is because killing happens fast and its irreversible, therefore tolerances to tackle spread of false information is too small to be allowed.
- raxxorraxor 2y agoNot the war on drugs, but certainly the "war on terror". This is not clinging to definitions, it is political reality that such measures would also be undertaken in peace time, any justification would suffice. Who do you believe would draw the line here anyway? Also, especially in times of war, there is a heightened interest of people getting news and independent reporting. Any other news isn't worth the read.
- mrtksn 2y agoYeah, just don’t fall for that kind of BS.