3 ms·
I was addressing the NAT point. NAT itself is not a firewall, there are different implementations of NAT e.g. full cone NAT that are particularly bad if what yo
by kaliszad 2y ago
I was addressing the NAT point. NAT itself is not a firewall, there are different implementations of NAT e.g. full cone NAT that are particularly bad if what you expect is a layer of stateful randomness.
And a firewall these days is not perfect either btw. if you can get your code to run on the client directly in some capacity.
Debian Testing and Unstable are mostly fine if you know what you are doing - you seem to have a clue. Security guidance is usually for people that need it - those that might not understand the full implications. Even for professionals it can be a useful reminder.
- bayindirh 2y ago> I was addressing the NAT point. Oh, OK. My bad, sorry. Thanks for the clarification.