30 ms·
Details are in the actual paper, and its linked prominently but it take a few clicks to get there. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960378/ https
by se4u 2y ago
Details are in the actual paper, and its linked prominently but it take a few clicks to get there.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960378/
There's even a video abstract!
- thedrexster 2y agovideo abstract direct link (40.7MB mp4): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960378/bin/40168_2024_1777_MOESM8_ESM.mp4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960378/bin/40...
- verisimi 2y agoI've skimmed this, it makes no sense to me. There are some graphics. There are things like this: > The ISS genomes exhibited an average of 4568 genes, a significantly higher count than the average of 4416 genes found in the Earth genomes. Yes, 4568 is a significantly higher count than 4416. But if I took samples of this bacteria from different countries, would I see a similarly significantly different count? I've no idea.. is this even significant without this sort of comparison? I watched the video too. This really is just a bunch of stock footage, with the same info as the linked NASA article. Do others find this info to be compelling of anything? It seems that this could be a PR piece of some sort, for 'space science'. I don't get the significance.