4 ms·
I didn't realise they had two versions, but it makes sense. Is the anti-infidel version only available in Arabic then?
by exe34 3y ago
I didn't realise they had two versions, but it makes sense. Is the anti-infidel version only available in Arabic then?
- cjk2 3y agoYes it is. They have low to no journalistic standards in that edition and it's heavily propagandized depending on their agenda. Their entire reputation is based on the Western version as "look we use those standards everywhere" which is definitely not true.
- jay-barronville 3y agoWhere’s the proof to back your statement? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
- exe34 3y agoI believe you, but I too would like a citation that I can share with others - even a blog post with some examples would be helpful.
- erichocean 3y agoCNN has two versions too, one for US audiences and one for the world.
- vundercind 3y agoI’m pretty sure that’s more normal than not for news orgs that have a home country or region but also compete on the global market. Some have several versions, not just two.
- lazyasciiart 3y agoThe Guardian is known for having such different takes on transgender rights in their US and British editions that the US employees complained.
- angra_mainyu 3y ago[flagged]
- gregoryl 3y agoWhich Arab countries?
- exe34 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_controversies_and_criticism#:~:text=Saudi%20Arabia%20banned%20Al%2DJazeera,Trump%27s%20policy%20toward%20Iran https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_controversies_and_c.... There's quite a few countries on there, I didn't realise it was so widely mistrusted in the Arab world.
- NomDePlum 3y agoI can't find any indication that what you claim is true. Can you provide citations?
- angra_mainyu 3y agoThat sounds like a comment made in bad faith. What did you Google?
- ashconnor 3y ago"anti-infidel version" - Godwin's Law but descending to Islamophobia.