4 ms·
> that print things you don't like But that the whole point. It's not just that Israel "don't like it". It's false claims. > aren't sufficiently loud about r
by yonixw 2y ago
> that print things you don't like
But that the whole point. It's not just that Israel "don't like it". It's false claims.
> aren't sufficiently loud about retractions
And what if there are no retraction? only if the backlash is big enough? Like in the case where there were no hundreds of dead in a direct bombing but a 50 dead in a failed PIJ rocked on hospital:
https://archive.is/r6noB https://archive.is/r6noB
and the same version today:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2023/10/16/israel-hamas-war-live-iran-warns-resistance-front-may-attack https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2023/10/16/israel-ha...
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> in the case where there were no hundreds of dead in a direct bombing but a 50 dead in a failed PIJ rocked on hospital Almost every news agency got this wrong to some degree [1]. What matters is whether they corrected their story as new information arose. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/18/business/media/hospital-blast-gaza-reports.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/18/business/media/hospital-b...