> with all their US-sponsored weapons; under what conditions do we see the UK or Australia using these weapons where there is still a country left over afterwar

> with all their US-sponsored weapons; under what conditions do we see the UK or Australia using these weapons where there is still a country left over afterwards? The idea is that the more weapons you have the less likely it is that you would ever need to use them in a defensive full-scale war. > Tactically, Australia will probably just lose any fight against anyone more scary than New Zealand or Papua New Guinea. They might lose it strategically, but I don't really see how or why would China want to invade Australia (besides maybe trying to nuke its major cities). It hardly makes sense logistically.