Not a lawyer, but I don’t think that’s true. There isn’t anything in the Constitution about arbitration. Congress passed an arbitration law and nothing in it pr

Not a lawyer, but I don’t think that’s true. There isn’t anything in the Constitution about arbitration. Congress passed an arbitration law and nothing in it prevents all this. When cases go to court, the constitution is the only thing that could override the law, but if the law gets better, more specific, adds more protections, SCOTUS must respect that, again unless the Constitution somehow applied. A lot of SCOTUS opinions in general seem pretty clear that they wish Congress would act and spell out what they want to happen, because that sure as hell is better than running to the courts to decide everything.