3 ms·
The important part is it is only sanctionable. The boss is shown, in writing, to violate court orders, and the worst that will happen is having to pay an insig
by lotsofpulp 3y ago
The important part is it is only sanctionable. The boss is shown, in writing, to violate court orders, and the worst that will happen is having to pay an insignificant fee. So why not violate the court order?
- cogman10 3y agoSanctions can include jail time and a default judgement. That's not insignificant. Sanctions can just be fines, they can also be a lot more.
- ameister14 3y agoSo the risk is that if intent is shown the spoliated evidence is assumed to be unfavorable for the party responsible, so the court will tell the jury to consider the facts in light of the missing evidence being negative for Google. It can also result in a default judgment against Google.