4 ms·
>> Im also interested in what the differing factor is. > vast has a lot of bad machines with terrible PCIe lanes and architecture you have to learn the hard wa
by lelanthran 3y ago
>> Im also interested in what the differing factor is.
> vast has a lot of bad machines with terrible PCIe lanes and architecture you have to learn the hard way.
Wouldn't gpudeploy have exactly the same problem? How is it mitigated with gpudeploy?
- everforward 3y agoI think it's more of a business strategy issue than a technical one. I suspect it would be trivial for Vast or GPUDeploy to spin up a benchmarking job before allowing sales on that machine. I'm not an expert on PCIe lanes, but I would think the performance issues would be visible via bandwidth or latency on the lanes. It kind of makes sense to me, though. If I were looking for absolute reliability and was willing to pay for it, I'd just go to one of the many GPU cloud vendors. Likewise, I suspect anyone willing to really work on getting good performance would rather be a real provider or sub-provider than being part of this nebulous C2C GPU cloud.