> And now, with the threat of "communism" (no, it wasn't one, because communism would have meant giving up state power) "Not real communism" If it's only viab

> And now, with the threat of "communism" (no, it wasn't one, because communism would have meant giving up state power) "Not real communism" If it's only viable in theory, as shown by many practical failures, it's not worth discussing at all. > The progress you so enjoy is the product of trade, truly. Across thousands of years. But best trade is free trade. One where nobody is coerced by police NOR implicitly by having choices stripped away from them by the capitalist ruling class that just wants to maintain it's position. People deep in debt, living from paycheck to paycheck, cannot make their choices freely. This sounds like you'd like welfare capitalism. Bur your comment conflates and gish-gallops so many things that it's impossible to have a conversation with you.