3 ms·
If you are interested in dillo, have a look at netsurf, another css renderer, but this one has the big advantage to require only a plain an simple C compiler, n
by sylware 3y ago
If you are interested in dillo, have a look at netsurf, another css renderer, but this one has the big advantage to require only a plain an simple C compiler, not a gigantically complex c++ compiler.
That said, more noscript/basic (x)html browsers, the better, even written with computer languages with an extremely complex syntax (rust/java/etc).
- anthk 3y agoUnless Netsurf compiles with TinyCC, cparser or cproc, sadly both gcc and clang are bloated.
- sylware 3y agoI did a plain and simple C port of bzip2 busybox code for plain and simple C compilers: on bzip2 compression, tinycc is really slow, ~2 times slower than gcc (13.2 -O2)... but cproc/qbe gets... ~70-80% of gcc speed. Switching to cproc/qbe would clearly be a win for a lean open source stack (which de-facto excludes c++ and similar ultra-complex syntax computer languages). In my project list: a minimal linux kernel with gcc-cleaned C code.