4 ms·
1. Yes the article says that insurance agencies can only look at historic risk, not future risk. So a region becoming more fire prone won’t be reflected. 2. Pr
by vineyardmike 2y ago
1. Yes the article says that insurance agencies can only look at historic risk, not future risk. So a region becoming more fire prone won’t be reflected.
2. Presumably an area that just experienced a fire is now at lower risk of a repeated burn?
- lolinder 2y ago> the article says that insurance agencies can only look at historic risk, not future risk The article actually doesn't say that, that's a quote from a different article that I linked to above. The article only mentions the increased risk of wildfires and doesn't place any blame on California's regulatory environment at all. My other comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40260160 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40260160