3 ms·
The tax should be on wealth, not income. Why? Far-above average wealth amassed by 1 person represents wealth not in the hands of a wider public. This is damagi
by RetroTechie 2y ago
The tax should be on wealth, not income.
Why? Far-above average wealth amassed by 1 person represents wealth not in the hands of a wider public. This is damaging to society in many ways.
Example: compare homeless person who has ~0, buys a lottery ticket and wins $1M, with someone who already owns property worth $10M, and doesn't work in a year (and/or has accountant do creative bookkeeping to put income at ~0).
It makes no sense to (heavily) tax that newly minted millionaire since "high-income", while their ~0 income neighbour sits on a $10M home/yacht/pile of stock options/whatever. This holds even more true as you look further up the amassed-wealth ladder.
Redistribute those goodies! Well at least some of it, each year.