3 ms·

I would think that everything old is older than we think. Because we're almost certainly not correct about how old anything is - and it certainly can't be any y

• bazoom42 2y ago
  Why can’t something be younger than we think?
  • buovjaga 2y ago
    Indeed, as the authors of the article write: > While Grimm believed that many folktales were likely to be thousands of years old, only a tiny minority can be traced back to before the emergence of the literary fairy tale in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The "reconstructions" of the authors are based on fantasy. They try to sidestep the massive problem of possible literary origins by manufacturing data with their magical phylogenetic device. It's garbage in, garbage out.
  • fsckboy 2y ago
    he meant that any evidence we have puts a ... "floor" on how old something is, but it doesn't rule out it being even older. He wasn't using "we think" to mean "we imagine", he was using it to mean "we believe from evidence"