The article really needs more reporting on what exactly they were told from the other side of the table, even if half of the time it would have been unexcusable

The article really needs more reporting on what exactly they were told from the other side of the table, even if half of the time it would have been unexcusable bullshit. For the lawyer job it's said she left upset, but we don't get anything more about the interaction, which seemed to be the crucial part if it was a test. I'd see a point if the core of the job is to deal with conflictual situations, and it could be fair if the cabinet took the time to explain why they fail the test and how they could have been better (doesn't sound like they did, but it would at least balance the stress imposed on the candidates)