3 ms·
> Take that to it's extreme and you see that code can be simplified down to nothing without anything being destroyed. I disagree. The thing being destroyed is
by verve_rat 2y ago
> Take that to it's extreme and you see that code can be simplified down to nothing without anything being destroyed.
I disagree. The thing being destroyed is readability and common understanding with your fellow programmers.
- thunky 2y agoMy point was that removing code (not just reformatting it) without changing behavior is a gain, not a loss. Art is the opposite. That tells me that the code itself is not important; the task/instructions the code performs is the important part. Therefore code is a utility, not an artform. Yes I want written instructions to be understandable to humans, so my code conforms to tool-enforced formatting standards 100% of the time, not subject to artistic interpretation.