> For the "Slow" and "Clunky", I was talking more about the UX rather than the performance of such sites. "Clunky" I get is about UX, but "Slow"? In what way i

> For the "Slow" and "Clunky", I was talking more about the UX rather than the performance of such sites. "Clunky" I get is about UX, but "Slow"? In what way is UX of other lorem ipsum sites slow? I typed "lorem ipsum" into a search engine and the first three results were perfectly usable. Only one of them had a "copy" button, if that's what you're after. To their benefit, they were all less than 9MB of resources.