so why are they doing it? Could it be that the biggest company in the world benefits from these policies? By acknowledging that a resume might be affected by l

so why are they doing it? Could it be that the biggest company in the world benefits from these policies? By acknowledging that a resume might be affected by lack of opportunity, Microsoft gets to sample from a larger pool of potential excellence. It’s pretty simple really. Isn’t the success of Microsoft proof that diversity is actually beneficial to private industry? I’ve come to the conclusion that “meritocracy” - when used in the context of diversity - is just another code word for “racist fuckhead”, and honestly I’m sick of hearing about it.