2 ms·
It's neat to see the whole-party effort behind these things. The climate people and the government want to ban gas stoves, journalists write stories saying that
by sandspar 2y ago
It's neat to see the whole-party effort behind these things. The climate people and the government want to ban gas stoves, journalists write stories saying that this is misinformation and that the government has no such plans, universities dig up some data showing that gas stoves are unhealthy or whatever. It's cool to see how coordinated these things are - especially because I have no doubt that most of these people are acting independently. It's like, you don't even need to give orders. There's just a sort of mood in the air that people coordinate themselves around. We're like a bird flock, the way they kind of vote which direction they're going to fly in next.
- kukkamario 2y agoUniversities come up all sorts of results all the time. Media decides which are worth to make into news. I doubt this is first time that some university as come to this fairly obvious result, but now it is relevant so it becomes news. But induction stoves are just better for most users, no need to thing any grand conspiracy why many would prefer that it became more popular. They are safer. They heat faster and are also react immediately to changing heat level like gas stoves. Gas stoves do have some benefits compared to induction, but most only affect professionals. I'd guess at least 95% of people would prefer induction stoves, all costs being equal.
- peteradio 2y agoI prefer cooking in my own kitchen with gas stove and range hood than my parents with induction and no hood. It is a disgusting mess to cook on a stove without a hood.