> I am pretty convinced one student just copypasted my test questions into ChatGPT or BingAI and then copied the answers. I didn't have a way to prove it so I h

> I am pretty convinced one student just copypasted my test questions into ChatGPT or BingAI and then copied the answers. I didn't have a way to prove it so I had to give him the benefit of the doubt and grade it assuming he did it honestly. I wonder if a more AI-resistant approach is to provide poor code examples and to ask students to improve it and specifically explain their motivations. They can’t just rely on code output from an LLM. They need to understand what flaws exist and connect the flaw to the fix, which requires (for now, I think) higher-level comprehension.