4 ms·
I think you need to reread the article and seriously evaluate your motivations for how you've framed it.
by whoknowsidont 2y ago
I think you need to reread the article and seriously evaluate your motivations for how you've framed it.
- ein0p 2y agoI know people who work there, too. Some of them are execs. Let’s just say I don’t need help framing the article. My sole motivation is to get things to where merit and merit alone determines who gets hired and promoted. Not genitalia, sexual identity/orientation or color of the person’s skin.
- theragra 2y agoAccording to the book The origins of woke, you can't, because corporations mostly do DEI to avoid being sued by the government.
- whoknowsidont 2y agoYeah I don't think the government has any involvement in this area.
- whoknowsidont 2y ago"lol trust me bro." >My sole motivation is to get things to where merit and merit alone determines who gets hired and promoted The problem is that "merit" is an incredibly loaded term. It _sounds_ nice. But reality is messy. For example, how do you explain the incredibly tight and consistent correlation between the income group you're at by 30 and the one you were born into? Where is the merit in that?
- jovial_cavalier 2y agoI don't take it as an axiom that, whatever "merit" is, it's not heritable. Show me that your interventions un-correlate them.
- whoknowsidont 2y agoThat's not how that works, like at all. In any context, for any subject.