4 ms·
A modest proposal. Instead trying to keep the third world poor why don't we just nuke them? This has the triple benefit of: 1). Reducing the total population
by llm_trw 3y ago
A modest proposal.
Instead trying to keep the third world poor why don't we just nuke them?
This has the triple benefit of:
1). Reducing the total population.
2). Reducing CO2 production of the survivors.
3). Starting a nuclear winter.
It's just unethical to do anything else when faced with the impending disaster to the human race and the ecosystem.
- sgu999 3y agoYou'd be better off nuking the rich, they are the ones who are actually producing the bulk of the CO2. The debate on degrowth isn't whether a Somalian family should have access to a decent home, healthcare, clothing, enough food etc. The answer is a very obvious yes. The debate is whether a middle class American family really should own 2 trucks, live in a 200sqm house and eat that much meat. But you always make it about the poor.