4 ms·
Yeah, I'm not questioning your results. Probably some variation related to the machine, water quality/temperature etc. Which is why I wish forbrukerrådet was mo
by mtlmtlmtlmtl 2y ago
Yeah, I'm not questioning your results. Probably some variation related to the machine, water quality/temperature etc. Which is why I wish forbrukerrådet was more transparent about their methodology. Lot of possible confounders they just don't mention. Which machine(s) did they use? Did they use rinse aid? Salt? Which program? How hard is their water and how hot was it, or did they vary these parameters? How full was the machine? Etc.
My machine is pretty old. Old enough that it has no electronics, just one of those mechanical dials that slowly turns back to "zero" during the cycle. There are no programs really, just the ability to set the dial to various subsets of the full cycle.
It wouldn't surprise me if more modern machines are designed more with tablets in mind than powder. Seeing as it's now the most popular product.
- magicalhippo 2y ago> It wouldn't surprise me if more modern machines are designed more with tablets in mind than powder. Yeah in comparison ours is a high-end Bosch model that's just a few years old. It has sensors which supposedly detect how dirty the water is and whatnot. Would be interesting to do a comparison. For us the main kicker was less of the troubling chemicals. We could have lived with the reduction in washing power had those metrics been inverted.